Has defined deliverables so that applicants and assessors are clear as to what is expected from the Sponsors. Has scope for Sponsor in-kind contribution that brings genuine added value to the collaboration. If your Challenge proposal is selected: NC3Rs will Your organisation will Work together to develop the Challenge brief Support the launch event Be expected to present your Challenge at the launch event and interact with potential applicants Administer the application and funding process Be involved in the assessment process to decide the winning team Sign a contract supporting your organisation's commitment to the Challenge and the provision of in-kind support Project monitor the funded teams Provide in-kind contributions to, and work with, the winning team Work together to promote uptake of the Challenge product to maximise the 3Rs impact and improve science and business How to submit your Challenge NC3Rs staff will be happy to discuss your Challenge ideas at any time.
Assessment process Challenge submissions are considered by both independent scientific experts and the CRACK IT Advisory Panel , who will take the following criteria into consideration prior to making their final recommendations: Level of 3Rs impact.
Scientific quality. Level of Sponsor input e. Alignment with current NC3Rs portfolio and external activities.
Low risk of Challenge not being solved. Time to impact. Applicants from the same organisation s as the Sponsors are not eligible to apply. Agreement and awards Phase 1 awards made following the Review Panel are subject to the terms outlined in the Phase 1 contractor agreement. Applicants are strongly advised to read the agreements prior to applying. Agreements and awards Single Phase awards made following the Challenge Panel are subject terms outlined in the Single Phase contractor agreement.
Extensions cannot be used for: The sole purpose of using remaining funds. Starting new scientific work that was not outlined in the original application. Managing RO or applicant changes to research plans and staffing. Preparing new grant applications. The purpose of writing up results. Requests for additional funds will only be considered in exceptional circumstances. Peer reviewed papers reporting research that is wholly or partially funded by the NC3Rs should: Make reference to the 3Rs implications of the research, including in the abstract and the main body of the text.
Be published in journals which are compliant with the RCUK policy on open access. Include details of the funding that supported the research - NC3Rs support for an individual or research project should be acknowledged in all publications where such support has been significant i. Provide a statement on how the underlying research materials such as data, samples or models can be accessed.
Be reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines , taking into account the specific editorial policies of the journal concerned. We reserve the right to sanction a grant at any stage if unsatisfactory progress has been made.
What Details of all outputs, outcomes and impacts, when available, arising from the contract. In particular, complete the sections on Publications and Replacement, Reduction and Refinement. Why Researchfish is one method by which we monitor progress on contracts. Contractors who do not report into Researchfish when requested to do so, or use the system inappropriately, may become ineligible to apply for additional awards from the NC3Rs and potentially the Research Councils.
Researchfish is not a publicly accessible data repository. However, data held in Researchfish may be used by the NC3Rs to populate our website and for production of publications such as our Annual Report. The remit of the Panel includes: Assessment of the new Challenges proposed each year. Providing advice and feedback to Challenge contractors where needed. Assessment of Business Growth Scheme applications. Review of Solutions proposals. New Challenge submission assessment procedure Challenge Assessment generally consists of a two-stage process: The Advisory Panel assesses new Challenge submissions using the assessment criteria to evaluate the scientific quality, 3Rs impact and commercial potential of the submissions.
New Challenge submissions are then assessed by independent scientific experts who consider the viability, scientific quality and likely 3Rs impact of the proposal. Declaration of interests Advisory Panel members are required to declare any private, professional or commercial interests that might, or that might be perceived to, conflict with the NC3Rs interests as detailed in the declaration of interests policy.
All awards made under the BGS constitute de minimis aid. More information can be found in the Guide for Participants. Applicants must be European Union EU -based and from an established commercial entity.
Only one application to the BGS, per Challenge, will be accepted. BGS awards constitute de minimis aid. Be expected to present your Challenge at the launch event and interact with potential applicants. Details of all outputs, outcomes and impacts, when available, arising from the contract. Researchfish is one method by which we monitor progress on contracts.
Dr Zahid Latif. Perhaps there is an iPhone compatible old version of Trivia Crack out there somewhere. If you know where to find it, drop us a link in the comments! You can use programs like Kahoot to create your own quizzes, though the interface is just not the same. The app essentially allows you to build your own trivia game following the layout of our favorite trivia game shows, like Jeopardy and Family Feud.
The app is not only used by groups of friends and trivia enthusiasts, but also teachers, employers, and more. The game has several options regarding gameplay. There are many features you can play around with. Unfortunately, the latest reviews of TriviaMaker are negative. If you want to have access to all the features, you need to pay extra.
Without all the premium features, the game is not nearly as fun as Challenge mode in Trivia Crack was. Etermax claims the feature was not as popular as we think, while players say the developers had ill intentions when they removed Challenge mode.
What do you think really happened with Challenge mode? Were you a fan of the mode or did you not care at all? Have you found a decent replacement in the world of trivia apps? Let us know in the comments! Anastasia Voloshina is a professional writer, editor, and trivia enthusiast.
With an extensive background in trivia writing, Anastasia has developed a deep understanding of what it takes to run a successful game night. Your email address will not be published. Skip to content. If you are searching for answers, just type part of the question in the box below. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
0コメント